<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="Joomla! - Open Source Content Management" -->
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Court Stuff</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Expat's Concise Guide to Overcome Officialdom in Germany and so smoothly integrate into Germany to stay on the right side of the law]]></description>
		<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:06:46 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Joomla! - Open Source Content Management</generator>
		<atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff?format=feed&amp;type=rss"/>
		<language>en-gb</language>
		<item>
			<title>Acknowledgement of Foreign Judgments in Germany</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1619-acknowledgement-of-foreign-judgments-in-germany</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1619-acknowledgement-of-foreign-judgments-in-germany</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Acknowledgement of Foreign Judgments in Germany</h1>
<p>There is no standard procedure to acknowledge judgments from other countries. It all depends. It depends on what the judgment was based on. Depending on the content, different motions are to be applied so a foreign verdict can take effect.</p>
</div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:37:53 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Circumcision is a Crime</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1547-circumcision-is-a-crime</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1547-circumcision-is-a-crime</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Circumcision is a Crime</h1>
<p>A devout Muslim physician in Cologne circumcised a four-year-old boy in a professional manner, as the boy’s parents had requested. A medical indication did not exist. Two days later, as “normally” can happen, secondary bleeding occurred. The mother brought her son to the University Hospital Cologne where the bleeding was successfully stopped. Prosecuting authorities caught wind of this event and filed a suit on the grounds of §<a href="http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_stgb/englisch_stgb.html">223</a> StGB against the physician. LG2G briefly explains how and why the courts reacted.</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:03:41 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Constitutional Complaint Against Photo Shooting for Speed Traps</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1416-constitutional-complaint-against-photo-shooting-for-speed-traps</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1416-constitutional-complaint-against-photo-shooting-for-speed-traps</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Constitutional Complaint Against Photo Shooting for Speed Traps</h1>
<p>Has it ever happened to you that accidently - of course - drove a bit more than allowed? Well, you are not the only one! Some traffic offenders were caught and their lawyer applied in court the novel notion that taking pictures of drivers without their consent may not be used in court as evidence. The Federal Constitutional Court took a position on this in its judgment of July 5, 2010 (re 2 BvR 759/10).</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:09:47 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Do eMails qualify as proof in a case in court</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1505-do-emails-qualify-as-proof-in-a-case-in-court</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1505-do-emails-qualify-as-proof-in-a-case-in-court</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Do eMails Qualify as Proof in a Case in Court?</h1>
<p>Everybody uses emails nowadays and when all are in consensus one with another all is fine. But how will an email help prove anything when it goes to court? Can you prove that a contract has been closed just by eMail correspondence? Continue reading and you will know more.</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 15:21:27 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>German Courts Soon Discussing in English</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1415-german-courts-soon-discussing-in-english27</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1415-german-courts-soon-discussing-in-english27</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>German Courts Soon Discussing in English</h1>
<p>Based on an article of F.A.Z. online of 08. Januar 2010, it is planned that commercial cases can be discussed and judged in the English language. This is at least an initiative of the Ministers of Justice of North Rhine Westphalia and Hamburg, Müller-Piepenkötter (<a title="Christlich Demokratische Union - conservative party " href="http://www.cdu.de/en/3440.htm">CDU</a>) and Till Steffen (<a title="BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN - the " href="http://www.gruene.de/startseite.html">Grüne</a>).</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 06:19:54 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Germany Purchasing Tax Fraudster CD</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1366-germany-purchasing-tax-fraudster-cd</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1366-germany-purchasing-tax-fraudster-cd</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Germany Purchasing Tax Fraudster CD</h1>
<p>As has been heavily discussed in the press, Germany has decided to buy the "Tax Fraudster CD". In other words, the German government has decided to buy a CD containing data on alleged tax evaders, even though the information being sold was illegally gathered. The government intends to get wise to those who "forgot" to mention some foreign income. Is the policy legally permissible? May the state make common ground with criminals to catch other mal-doers?</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:07:56 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Interpreters to Understand Your Attorney now Financed by Legal Aid </title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/103-interpreters-to-understand-your-attorney-now-financed-by-legal-aid</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/103-interpreters-to-understand-your-attorney-now-financed-by-legal-aid</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Interpreters to Understand Your Attorney now Financed by Legal Aid</h1>
<p align="justify">The OLG Celle decided on April 5, 2005 (re: 22 W 12/05) that the costs of interpreters during detention pending expulsion are to be covered by granted legal aid in so far as they are necessary and appropriate for the foreigner to communicate with his or her attorney. If the case for the expulsion of the foreigner to his or her home country is successful, the prerequisites for legal aid must proven anew. Referring to previously submitted documents is usually not sufficient. <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br />Published on the old CMS: 2006/8/2<br />Read on the old CMS till November 2008: 4,836 reads</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:09:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Legal Aid for those on Welfare When Contesting or How Much can I be Consulted From an Office</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1160-legal-aid-for-those-on-welfare-when-contesting</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1160-legal-aid-for-those-on-welfare-when-contesting</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Legal Aid for those on Welfare When Contesting or How Much can I be Consulted From an Office<br /></h1>
<p>The Federal Constitutional Court had to decide whether a person needing legal advice after a reduction of welfare was entitled to consultation by an attorney or not. This much noticed judgment is of Mai 11, 2009 (re 1 BvR 1517/08).</p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:53:27 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Online Roulette Without Limit not Violating Good Morals</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1226-online-roulette-without-limit-not-violating-good-morals</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1226-online-roulette-without-limit-not-violating-good-morals</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Online Roulette Without Limit not Violating Good Morals?</h1>
<p>Can operators of online casinos really enforce payment of lost bets from such game? What do you think? The BGH gave an answer on April 3, 2008 (re III ZR 190/07) with its judgment.<img style="margin-right: 15px; margin-bottom: 15px; float: left;" src="https://www.lg2g.info/images/stories/content/roulette.jpg" alt="roulette" width="180" height="135" /></p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:58:23 +0200</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Rentention of Data Collected by Telecommunication Providers – Now Passé</title>
			<link>https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1361-rentention-of-data-collected-by-telecommunication-providers-now-passe</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lg2g.info/hints-to-overcome-officialdom-in-germany/court-stuff/1361-rentention-of-data-collected-by-telecommunication-providers-now-passe</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="feed-description"><h1>Rentention of Data Collected by Telecommunication Providers – Now Passé</h1>
<table style="margin:5px" border="1" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding:10px">
<h3 style="text-align: right;">Table of Contents</h3>
<p style="text-align: right;"><a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#Directive" target="_self">EU-Directive is Compliant to the Constitution</a> <br /> <a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#Security" target="_self">Security of the Data must be Guaranteed</a><br /> <a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#restrictions" target="_self">Restrictions on the Use of the Data</a><br /> <a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#Transparency" target="_self">Transparency of Retention and Exploitation</a><br /> <a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#recourse" target="_self">Legal Recourse and Sanctions in Cases of Misuse</a><br /> <a href="https://www.lg2g.info/#Remark" target="_self">Remark</a></p></div>]]></description>
			<author>hi@lg2g.info (AvE)</author>
			<category>Court Stuff</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 07:32:40 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
