<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="Joomla! - Open Source Content Management" -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xml:lang="en-gb">
	<title type="text">News on Civil Liabilty</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Expat's Concise Guide to Overcome Officialdom in Germany and so smoothly integrate into Germany to stay on the right side of the law</subtitle>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info"/>
	<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/civil-law/archived-news-on-civil-liability-questions</id>
	<updated>2025-02-07T12:14:03+01:00</updated>
	<generator uri="http://joomla.org" version="2.5">Joomla! - Open Source Content Management</generator>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/civil-law/archived-news-on-civil-liability-questions?format=feed&amp;type=atom"/>
	<entry>
		<title>Accident-Damaged Car as a Defect for a used Car </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/76-accident-damaged-car-as-a-defect-for-a-used-car"/>
		<published>2008-11-06T23:47:16+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-06T23:47:16+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/76-accident-damaged-car-as-a-defect-for-a-used-car</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Accident-Damaged Car as a Defect for a used Car&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The VIIIth Senate of the BGH had to decide if a used car that had been significantly damaged in a previous accident and in the meantime had been repaired, is defective because it varies from the usual condition of comparable goods. (10, 2007 VIII ZR 330/06).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Accident-Damaged Car as a Defect for a used Car&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;The VIIIth Senate of the BGH had to decide if a used car that had been significantly damaged in a previous accident and in the meantime had been repaired, is defective because it varies from the usual condition of comparable goods. (10, 2007 VIII ZR 330/06).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Advancing Postage for the Return of Unsold Goods </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/77-advancing-postage-for-the-return-of-unsold-goods"/>
		<published>2008-11-06T23:48:26+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-06T23:48:26+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/77-advancing-postage-for-the-return-of-unsold-goods</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Advancing Postage for the Return of Unsold Goods&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When selling goods long-distance, customers often make use of their right to return the sold articles. Following §&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#Section%20357&quot; target=&quot;_parent&quot;&gt;357&lt;/a&gt; II 2 BGB, the vendor has to carry the costs of returning the unsold article – whenever a sale was not made, even for mail orders. The defendant in this case, however, wanted to use a trick to reduce his postage costs. He wrote in his standard terms and conditions, that he refused to accept parcels with postage unpaid. However, he promised to refund the customer immediately after receipt of the returned item. Is this trick permissible? The &lt;em&gt;Hanseatisches OLG &lt;/em&gt;decided this case on February 14, 2007 (re 5 W 15/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Advancing Postage for the Return of Unsold Goods&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;When selling goods long-distance, customers often make use of their right to return the sold articles. Following §&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_bgb/englisch_bgb.html#Section%20357&quot; target=&quot;_parent&quot;&gt;357&lt;/a&gt; II 2 BGB, the vendor has to carry the costs of returning the unsold article – whenever a sale was not made, even for mail orders. The defendant in this case, however, wanted to use a trick to reduce his postage costs. He wrote in his standard terms and conditions, that he refused to accept parcels with postage unpaid. However, he promised to refund the customer immediately after receipt of the returned item. Is this trick permissible? The &lt;em&gt;Hanseatisches OLG &lt;/em&gt;decided this case on February 14, 2007 (re 5 W 15/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>ATM: Banks Repsonsibility for too little Pay Out</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1129-atm-banks-repsonsibility-for-too-little-pay-out"/>
		<published>2009-04-03T16:08:08+02:00</published>
		<updated>2009-04-03T16:08:08+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1129-atm-banks-repsonsibility-for-too-little-pay-out</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;ATM: Banks Repsonsibility for too little Pay Out&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That ATMs &quot;devour&quot; money cards happens. Usually, this is no problem as the bank personnel can quickly clarify this problem. Normally, ATMs give out the requested amount but who is responsible, who has to prove what, when something goes wrong? LG Stuttgart answered that question on October 7, 2008 (re 13 S 189/08).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;ATM: Banks Repsonsibility for too little Pay Out&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That ATMs &quot;devour&quot; money cards happens. Usually, this is no problem as the bank personnel can quickly clarify this problem. Normally, ATMs give out the requested amount but who is responsible, who has to prove what, when something goes wrong? LG Stuttgart answered that question on October 7, 2008 (re 13 S 189/08).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Bald, Shaggy and Matted – Pain Money from Barber</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1329-pain-money-from-barber-bald-shaggy-and-matted"/>
		<published>2009-12-08T10:13:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2009-12-08T10:13:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1329-pain-money-from-barber-bald-shaggy-and-matted</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Bald, Shaggy and Matted – Pain Money from a Barber  ...&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a visit to the barber turns out to be a visitation, you leave looking like having had your fingers plugged into the outlet, instead of the blow dryer. Uaagh! The more the haircutter makes a disaster of your hair the more &lt;a href=&quot;Injuries/Damages/torts-personal-injury-malicious-damages.html&quot;&gt;pain money&lt;/a&gt; you will be entitled to. This article will show you more explicitly what in two cases your rights can be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Bald, Shaggy and Matted – Pain Money from a Barber  ...&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a visit to the barber turns out to be a visitation, you leave looking like having had your fingers plugged into the outlet, instead of the blow dryer. Uaagh! The more the haircutter makes a disaster of your hair the more &lt;a href=&quot;Injuries/Damages/torts-personal-injury-malicious-damages.html&quot;&gt;pain money&lt;/a&gt; you will be entitled to. This article will show you more explicitly what in two cases your rights can be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Bank Customers responsible for Lost EC-Card </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/79-bank-customers-responsible-for-lost-ec-card"/>
		<published>2008-11-06T23:50:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-06T23:50:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/79-bank-customers-responsible-for-lost-ec-card</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Bank Customers responsible for Lost EC-Card &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Banks usually do not have to refund their customers after their EC-card has been stolen. The judges of BGH decided that the EC-card system with PIN is adequately safe against misuse. A customer can only then successfully sue the bank for the refunding of illegal use of the card if there is circumstantial evidence for a misuse or disturbance in the security measures. (re: October 5, 2004, XI ZR 210/03).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Bank Customers responsible for Lost EC-Card &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Banks usually do not have to refund their customers after their EC-card has been stolen. The judges of BGH decided that the EC-card system with PIN is adequately safe against misuse. A customer can only then successfully sue the bank for the refunding of illegal use of the card if there is circumstantial evidence for a misuse or disturbance in the security measures. (re: October 5, 2004, XI ZR 210/03).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Calculation of Damages when Returning Wrong Pet</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1149-calculation-of-damages-when-returning-wrong-pet"/>
		<published>2009-05-29T09:28:30+02:00</published>
		<updated>2009-05-29T09:28:30+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1149-calculation-of-damages-when-returning-wrong-pet</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Calculation of Damages when Returning Wrong Pet&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When buying a pet all hearts are high. All hearts are low when it turns out the pet bought has flaws that lead you to return it to the vendor. BGH gave rules on November 19, 2008 (re VIII ZR 311/07) on how to calculate the reimbursements for &quot;use and wear of&quot; the pet to the vendor upon cancelling the contract.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Calculation of Damages when Returning Wrong Pet&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When buying a pet all hearts are high. All hearts are low when it turns out the pet bought has flaws that lead you to return it to the vendor. BGH gave rules on November 19, 2008 (re VIII ZR 311/07) on how to calculate the reimbursements for &quot;use and wear of&quot; the pet to the vendor upon cancelling the contract.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Can a Car Wash Exclude its Liability? </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/63-can-a-car-wash-exclude-its-liability"/>
		<published>2008-11-06T23:38:35+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-06T23:38:35+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/63-can-a-car-wash-exclude-its-liability</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Can a Car Wash Exclude its Liability?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as your clothes do, so does your car need a wash once in a while. Who is responsible for damages that occur if the machine does not work properly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Can a Car Wash Exclude its Liability?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just as your clothes do, so does your car need a wash once in a while. Who is responsible for damages that occur if the machine does not work properly?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Club's President Liable in Spite of Exoneration?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1373-clubs-president-liable-in-spite-of-exoneration14"/>
		<published>2010-04-06T14:57:52+02:00</published>
		<updated>2010-04-06T14:57:52+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/1373-clubs-president-liable-in-spite-of-exoneration14</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Club's President Liable in Spite of Exoneration?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As usual during an annual general assembly of any association the board is audited and exonerated from any mistakes. But is this still true when afterwards inconsistencies are discovered that might deprive the organization of charitable status? The Brandenburg OLG made a decision in this issue on May 28, 2008 (re 7 U 178/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Club's President Liable in Spite of Exoneration?&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As usual during an annual general assembly of any association the board is audited and exonerated from any mistakes. But is this still true when afterwards inconsistencies are discovered that might deprive the organization of charitable status? The Brandenburg OLG made a decision in this issue on May 28, 2008 (re 7 U 178/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Damages for Derogatory Remarks against a Collective </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/283-damages-for-derogatory-remarks-against-a-collective"/>
		<published>2008-11-19T23:23:50+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-19T23:23:50+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/283-damages-for-derogatory-remarks-against-a-collective</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Damages for Derogatory Remarks against a Collective&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This article reports on the ruling of the OLG Karlsruhe of April 13, 2007 (re 14 U 11/07 1) answering the question if you can collect damages from a civil wrong or “tort of insult” when not you personally but the collective, you belong to, has been addressed. “Collective” is used in this circumstance as an undefined number of persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Damages for Derogatory Remarks against a Collective&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;This article reports on the ruling of the OLG Karlsruhe of April 13, 2007 (re 14 U 11/07 1) answering the question if you can collect damages from a civil wrong or “tort of insult” when not you personally but the collective, you belong to, has been addressed. “Collective” is used in this circumstance as an undefined number of persons.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Damages for Invading Post Mortal Right of Privacy </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/777-damages-for-invading-post-mortal-right-of-privacy"/>
		<published>2009-02-05T16:26:05+01:00</published>
		<updated>2009-02-05T16:26:05+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/31-civil-law-news-on-liability-questions/777-damages-for-invading-post-mortal-right-of-privacy</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Damages for Invading Post Mortal Right of Privacy&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Does reporting on TV about a deceased mother give grounds for damages for invasion of privacy? The BGH December 6,2005 re VI ZR 265/04) answered this question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Damages for Invading Post Mortal Right of Privacy&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;Does reporting on TV about a deceased mother give grounds for damages for invasion of privacy? The BGH December 6,2005 re VI ZR 265/04) answered this question.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Civil Law News: Liability Questions" />
	</entry>
</feed>
