<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- generator="Joomla! - Open Source Content Management" -->
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"  xml:lang="en-gb">
	<title type="text">News on Child Benefits</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Expat's Concise Guide to Overcome Officialdom in Germany and so smoothly integrate into Germany to stay on the right side of the law</subtitle>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info"/>
	<id>https://www.lg2g.info/private-legalities/taxation/children/news-on-child-benefits</id>
	<updated>2025-02-07T12:12:31+01:00</updated>
	<generator uri="http://joomla.org" version="2.5">Joomla! - Open Source Content Management</generator>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.lg2g.info/private-legalities/taxation/children/news-on-child-benefits?format=feed&amp;type=atom"/>
	<entry>
		<title>Child Benefits for Unregistered Adult Child Looking for Work</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/801-child-benefits-for-unregistered-adult-child-looking-for-work"/>
		<published>2009-03-08T17:51:03+01:00</published>
		<updated>2009-03-08T17:51:03+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/801-child-benefits-for-unregistered-adult-child-looking-for-work</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;




 Normal   0   21         false   false   false  

  
&lt;h1&gt;Child Benefits for Unregistered Adult Child Looking for Work&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under certain conditions, parents of adult children are entitled to child benefits. In this case, the problem is when this child is looking for work and the Labor Office deletes this child from the list of persons searching vocational training. The Federal Tax Court gave some clarification on June 19, 2008 (re III R 66/05 and III R 68/05).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;




 Normal   0   21         false   false   false  

  
&lt;h1&gt;Child Benefits for Unregistered Adult Child Looking for Work&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under certain conditions, parents of adult children are entitled to child benefits. In this case, the problem is when this child is looking for work and the Labor Office deletes this child from the list of persons searching vocational training. The Federal Tax Court gave some clarification on June 19, 2008 (re III R 66/05 and III R 68/05).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Child Benefits when Child Moves to other Parent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1390-child-benefits-when-child-moves-to-other-parent"/>
		<published>2010-05-15T07:29:37+02:00</published>
		<updated>2010-05-15T07:29:37+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1390-child-benefits-when-child-moves-to-other-parent</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Child Benefits when Child Moves to other Parent&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When parents live separated and the child moves to the other parent. Who is entitled to the child benefits? The parent entitled to custody or the one with whom the child is living? The Federal Tax Court decided this question with its judgment of June 25, 2009 (re III R 2/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Child Benefits when Child Moves to other Parent&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When parents live separated and the child moves to the other parent. Who is entitled to the child benefits? The parent entitled to custody or the one with whom the child is living? The Federal Tax Court decided this question with its judgment of June 25, 2009 (re III R 2/07).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Clever Change of Tax Class can Raise Parental Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1145-clever-change-of-tax-class-can-raise-parental-benefits"/>
		<published>2009-05-19T08:55:20+02:00</published>
		<updated>2009-05-19T08:55:20+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1145-clever-change-of-tax-class-can-raise-parental-benefits</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Clever Change of Tax Class can Raise Parental Benefits&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following two recent decisions of the LSG NRW (December 12, 2008 L 13 EG 40/08 and January 16, 2009 L 13 EG 51/08), married couples are allowed to change into less favorite tax class in order to obtain more parental money. This article will give you hints how this in practice. This can pay out in an increased bottom line for the couple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Clever Change of Tax Class can Raise Parental Benefits&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following two recent decisions of the LSG NRW (December 12, 2008 L 13 EG 40/08 and January 16, 2009 L 13 EG 51/08), married couples are allowed to change into less favorite tax class in order to obtain more parental money. This article will give you hints how this in practice. This can pay out in an increased bottom line for the couple.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>End of Child’s Professional Education for Child Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/241-end-of-childs-professional-education-for-child-benefits"/>
		<published>2008-11-07T23:02:16+01:00</published>
		<updated>2008-11-07T23:02:16+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/241-end-of-childs-professional-education-for-child-benefits</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;End of Child’s Professional Education for Child Benefits&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In Germany, there is a universal child subsidy (&lt;em&gt;Kindergeld&lt;/em&gt;), paid monthly, available to all parents of under-age children. And when a child is in formal education, the benefit can continue until age 27. But when has the child finished learning and who has to prove it? This question generally arises in circumstances of either underpayment or overpayment of the child benefit. The question was answered by FG Munich (re 9 K 4794/03, judgment of July 3, 2006).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;End of Child’s Professional Education for Child Benefits&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In Germany, there is a universal child subsidy (&lt;em&gt;Kindergeld&lt;/em&gt;), paid monthly, available to all parents of under-age children. And when a child is in formal education, the benefit can continue until age 27. But when has the child finished learning and who has to prove it? This question generally arises in circumstances of either underpayment or overpayment of the child benefit. The question was answered by FG Munich (re 9 K 4794/03, judgment of July 3, 2006).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Internship without Vocational Goal and Child Benefits</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1530-internship-without-vocational-goal-and-child-benefits"/>
		<published>2011-12-21T16:59:19+01:00</published>
		<updated>2011-12-21T16:59:19+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1530-internship-without-vocational-goal-and-child-benefits</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Internship without Vocational Goal and Child Benefits&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you still eligible for child benefits for your adult child when he or she participates in an internship that has no vocational goal (i.e. your child wanted to earn something on the side and declare this as an internship)? The FG Münster decided exactly that question on June 1, 2011 (re 11 K 4118/09 Kg).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Internship without Vocational Goal and Child Benefits&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you still eligible for child benefits for your adult child when he or she participates in an internship that has no vocational goal (i.e. your child wanted to earn something on the side and declare this as an internship)? The FG Münster decided exactly that question on June 1, 2011 (re 11 K 4118/09 Kg).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>No Child Benefits for Refugees Constitutional</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1408-no-child-benefits-for-refugees-constitutional"/>
		<published>2010-08-14T16:47:14+02:00</published>
		<updated>2010-08-14T16:47:14+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1408-no-child-benefits-for-refugees-constitutional</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;No Child Benefits for Refugees Constitutional&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are not child benefits (&lt;em&gt;Kindergeld&lt;/em&gt;) linked to raising a child and not to the legal status of an alien? Can it be that such a provision as §62 II no. 2 lit. c EStG is even constitutional? Well the Federal Tax Court confirmed it previous precedences to this question with its verdict of April 28, 2010 (re III R 1/08).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the age of 18, Mirje moved from ex Yugoslavia in 2000 to wed her 16-year-old fiancée. She first had the status of toleration; meaning she was supposed to leave the country but this could not be enforced. As time passed, she gave birth to two children. Her third child, however, was granted German citizenship. Mirje's and her children's livelihood was secured by welfare. In 2005, Mirje was granted a residence permit pursuant to §&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_aufenthg/englisch_aufenthg.html#p0316&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;§25 Residence Act: Humanitarian Grounds – click here to read this statutory provision in English !&quot;&gt;25&lt;/a&gt; V AufenthG on humanitarian grounds. This kind of permit only then makes Mirje eligible for child benefits when she has a legal status for at least three years and is legally working in Germany. In the same month, she applied for child benefits without success. Seeking legal recourse was also without success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirje argued that it was unconstitutional because her exclusion as a foreigner constitutes an unequal treatment (art. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0022&quot; title=&quot;art. 3 Grundgesetz = Basic Act = Federal Constitution: Equality before the Law – click here to read this constitutional provision in English !&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt; I GG). She, as an unmarried foreigner, does not receive child benefits while foreigners living with their German family member do get such benefits. The kind of residence permit may not determine whether or not a person is eligible for child benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As previously ruled, the court acknowledges the lawgiver's wide scope of setting the rules for eligibility of child benefits. It is inside the lawmaker's discretion to link the benefits to the residential status of a foreigner. The court sees no reason to change its ruling case law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It might be that the Federal Social Court sees constitutional issues in regards to &quot;&lt;em&gt;Erziehungsgeld&lt;/em&gt; (Benefits for Raising Children)&quot; pursuant to §8 I 1 BErzGG such benefits are based on social law, or welfare, and not in tax law. This makes things different. The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGE 111, 160) has the point of view that loss of child benefits and needing supplementary welfare reduce the chances of aliens to improve their residential status. However that might be, since the new law of 2005 came into effect, foreigners are required to have their livelihood ensured in order to obtain or retain a residence permit (§&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_aufenthg/englisch_aufenthg.html#p0058&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;§5 Residence Act: General Preconditions for the Granting of a Residence Titel – click here to read this statutory provision in English !&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt; I no. 1 AufenthG).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;No Child Benefits for Refugees Constitutional&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are not child benefits (&lt;em&gt;Kindergeld&lt;/em&gt;) linked to raising a child and not to the legal status of an alien? Can it be that such a provision as §62 II no. 2 lit. c EStG is even constitutional? Well the Federal Tax Court confirmed it previous precedences to this question with its verdict of April 28, 2010 (re III R 1/08).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the age of 18, Mirje moved from ex Yugoslavia in 2000 to wed her 16-year-old fiancée. She first had the status of toleration; meaning she was supposed to leave the country but this could not be enforced. As time passed, she gave birth to two children. Her third child, however, was granted German citizenship. Mirje's and her children's livelihood was secured by welfare. In 2005, Mirje was granted a residence permit pursuant to §&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_aufenthg/englisch_aufenthg.html#p0316&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;§25 Residence Act: Humanitarian Grounds – click here to read this statutory provision in English !&quot;&gt;25&lt;/a&gt; V AufenthG on humanitarian grounds. This kind of permit only then makes Mirje eligible for child benefits when she has a legal status for at least three years and is legally working in Germany. In the same month, she applied for child benefits without success. Seeking legal recourse was also without success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirje argued that it was unconstitutional because her exclusion as a foreigner constitutes an unequal treatment (art. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg/englisch_gg.html#p0022&quot; title=&quot;art. 3 Grundgesetz = Basic Act = Federal Constitution: Equality before the Law – click here to read this constitutional provision in English !&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt; I GG). She, as an unmarried foreigner, does not receive child benefits while foreigners living with their German family member do get such benefits. The kind of residence permit may not determine whether or not a person is eligible for child benefits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As previously ruled, the court acknowledges the lawgiver's wide scope of setting the rules for eligibility of child benefits. It is inside the lawmaker's discretion to link the benefits to the residential status of a foreigner. The court sees no reason to change its ruling case law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It might be that the Federal Social Court sees constitutional issues in regards to &quot;&lt;em&gt;Erziehungsgeld&lt;/em&gt; (Benefits for Raising Children)&quot; pursuant to §8 I 1 BErzGG such benefits are based on social law, or welfare, and not in tax law. This makes things different. The Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfGE 111, 160) has the point of view that loss of child benefits and needing supplementary welfare reduce the chances of aliens to improve their residential status. However that might be, since the new law of 2005 came into effect, foreigners are required to have their livelihood ensured in order to obtain or retain a residence permit (§&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_aufenthg/englisch_aufenthg.html#p0058&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; title=&quot;§5 Residence Act: General Preconditions for the Granting of a Residence Titel – click here to read this statutory provision in English !&quot;&gt;5&lt;/a&gt; I no. 1 AufenthG).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>No Child Exemptions with Flat Income Taxation </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/762-no-child-exemptions-with-flat-income-taxation"/>
		<published>2009-02-04T16:14:04+01:00</published>
		<updated>2009-02-04T16:14:04+01:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/762-no-child-exemptions-with-flat-income-taxation</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No Child Exemptions with Flat Income Taxation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In certain constellations, the employer can choose to pay a flat wage tax for his employee when paying for other income next to the employee's normal salary. Such income often covers the costs for the private use of the company's car. The BFH judgment of July 26, 2007, re VI R 48/03 (published on August 15, 2007) had to decide whether the child exemptions (&quot;&lt;em&gt;Kinderfreibetrag&lt;/em&gt;&quot;) were to be applied for such flat taxation or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No Child Exemptions with Flat Income Taxation&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;justify&quot;&gt;In certain constellations, the employer can choose to pay a flat wage tax for his employee when paying for other income next to the employee's normal salary. Such income often covers the costs for the private use of the company's car. The BFH judgment of July 26, 2007, re VI R 48/03 (published on August 15, 2007) had to decide whether the child exemptions (&quot;&lt;em&gt;Kinderfreibetrag&lt;/em&gt;&quot;) were to be applied for such flat taxation or not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<title>Preparing for German High School as Vocational Education </title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1385-preparing-for-german-high-school-as-vocational-education"/>
		<published>2010-05-03T08:09:27+02:00</published>
		<updated>2010-05-03T08:09:27+02:00</updated>
		<id>https://www.lg2g.info/legal-news-on/archived-news-on-taxes-for-private-persons/on-child-benefits/1385-preparing-for-german-high-school-as-vocational-education</id>
		<author>
			<name>AvE</name>
			<email>hi@lg2g.info</email>
		</author>
		<summary type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Preparing for German High School as Vocational Education&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can Department for Child and Family Services &lt;span&gt;deny child benefits for a student of a private school or one not enrolled in any school (so called &quot;&lt;em&gt;Nichtschüler&lt;/em&gt;&quot;) because the preparation for German high school graduation (&lt;em&gt;Abitur&lt;/em&gt;) does not qualify as a vocational training. The judgment of the Bundesfinanzhof of March 18, 2009 (re III R 26/06) will tell us if this opinion has any merits. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<content type="html">&lt;div class=&quot;feed-description&quot;&gt;&lt;h1&gt;Preparing for German High School as Vocational Education&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can Department for Child and Family Services &lt;span&gt;deny child benefits for a student of a private school or one not enrolled in any school (so called &quot;&lt;em&gt;Nichtschüler&lt;/em&gt;&quot;) because the preparation for German high school graduation (&lt;em&gt;Abitur&lt;/em&gt;) does not qualify as a vocational training. The judgment of the Bundesfinanzhof of March 18, 2009 (re III R 26/06) will tell us if this opinion has any merits. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content>
		<category term="Private Tax News: Child Benefits" />
	</entry>
</feed>
